A landmark Supreme Court case involving one 15-year-old Jonathan Spencer is making waves across the court. With a history of violence, Jonathan has been in and out of the juvenile detention center. However, unbeknownst to Jonathan, the DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) suspected that an illegal marijuana business was being run out of an RV on his property in the woods. They then dispatched an advanced drone to watch the RV through the trees and unexpectedly found evidence of Jonathan heavily assaulting a 15-year-old girl. Jonathan was then charged with second degree attempted murder and given 50 years jail time without parole. Dealing with the 4th and 8th amendments of the constitution, this case is mainly an argument on whether the evidence obtained by police is admissible in court and if the punishment levied against Jonathan is justified. The prosecution holds that the drone did not violate the 4th amendment and his sentence is justified, per district attorney Issac Netters. The defense holds that the evidence against Jonathan is invalid and are working to reduce his sentence, per public defender Andrew Wei. Both legal teams as well as the Supreme Court justices are hard at work to ensure the constitution is interpreted freely and fairly. The Supreme Court justices are also working on getting their official robes to ensure their jobs run smoothly.
Be First to Comment